Already a member?
Sign in
Welcome! This is a website that everyone can build together. It's easy!
- EasyEdit
- Edit tags
- Email page
-
(what's this?What are these tools?
People just like you can add or edit the content on this site. If you want to try editing, but aren't ready to add to this site, try our demo area.
Read more about editing pages at Wetpaint Central.
)
Statement
PRESENTED BY THE RESIDENTS OF LEVENSHULME ON 10TH MARCH 2007
This statement has been jointly prepared by various residents' groups and individual citizens of Levenshulme in response to the consultation on the Strategic Regeneration Framework (SRF) for South Manchester, which Levenshulme partly belongs to.
We firstly would like to welcome the Council's intention to tackle the tough issues prevalent in some of the areas within the South Manchester SRF, and thoroughly agree with the identified vision for neighbourhood centres as "places of choice". We are delighted to see plans for improving public transport in the area, including a rail link to the airport and the proposed improvements to East-West connectivity.
We also welcome the consultation on the plan which allows us to express our concerns about the future of the Levenshulme. We argue that the issues facing Levenshulme have been overlooked in this framework for reasons that we outline below:
1) It is important that the consultation document recognises the disparate nature of the South Manchester area characterised by the polarity between the most affluent districts in the borough and those areas with considerable social and environmental problems. With only seven Super Output Areas (SOA) in the South Manchester SRF falling within the worst 5% in the country (according to the Indices of Multiple Deprivation IMD 2004 data), such detail can easily be lost focusing on Ward level data. We fear this is the case with Levenshulme where you can find an SOA that is among the most deprived 5% in the country ranking 1442 in IMD 2004. We argue that the proposed South Manchester SRF does not offer any solution to address these problems in Levenshulme.
2) We are extremely concerned that the very core or the neighbourhood centre has been split between two different SRFs which creates confusion and may have resulted in the area “slipping through the net”. Some of our landmark amenities (library and Levenshulme Baths) are not included in the remit of the South Manchester SFR.
3) Levenshulme is a special case representing a pocket of deprivation within affluence, therefore special measures are required to ensure that it no longer escapes the regeneration it urgently needs. With the commitment of the local residents we feel that it is not too late to change its fortunes. The recent closures of local amenities (including the local supermarket and the last remaining community centre) leave this area very vulnerable to further deterioration which it can ill afford. Uncertainty about the future of Levenshulme Baths and the library add to the frustration in the community.
We invite you take forward our concerns as our elected representative and would be more than happy to discuss any suitable way forward to regenerate our neighbourhood in order to create a sustainable future for Levenshulme.
Latest page update: made by dngjamie
, Jun 10 2007, 3:52 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by dngjamie
4 words deleted
1 image added
view changes
- complete history)
4 words deleted
1 image added
view changes
- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beggarsbelief2 | nag the regeneration team | 0 | Mar 30 2007, 4:15 PM EDT by beggarsbelief2 | |
|
Thread started: Mar 30 2007, 4:15 PM EDT
Watch
we must keep on at the regeneration team as well as the councillors - and keep those press releases going too. The local paper is a good ally if you get them involved on our side and the council dont like it because everyone reads the evening news(no matter what you think of it) and the metro comes thropugh most doors, so its a good way to keep people informed. I agree that the slicing off of part of Levenshulme is not helpful in the regeneration plan. Where is the sensein it - when a few years ago it was all about ALL (Ardwick, Longsight and Levenshulme) which has a sense because of the A6 link between these areas.
|
||||
| Anonymous | Who's looking after Levnshulme? | 1 | Mar 24 2007, 4:50 AM EDT by Anonymous | |
|
|
Thread started: Mar 22 2007, 6:35 PM EDT
Watch
This statement highlights some important issues and presents them very well. However, part of the problem is the 'elected representatives', so I am not sure that asking them to progress this will provide any solution.Tthis is not a personal attack on any of our councillors but simply a statement of fact. We have a Labour Council intent on punishing Levenshulme for electing Lib Dem Councillors. Both Labour Council and Lib Dem Councillors are locked in an endless point scoring battle in which Levenshulme and its residents are the losers. It's time we all moved on! And if Council and Councillors can't do that then we need to look at ways to challenge them and to act independently.
|
|||
